In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing defendant Ronald Luttrell contended that the lower court denied Mr. Luttrell's rights to due process and to be free from double jeopardy when it denied his motion f...
In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, Sandra Dean, the attorney representing appellant Anzara Brown, sought to reverse her client's convictions and sentence. Ms. Dean contended that the lower court abused its discretion by admi... View Proceeding
In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, Nicole Walker, the attorney representing appellant Brandon Williams, sought to reverse her client's convictions. On November 5, 2012, Mr. Williams was indicted on one count each of burglary... View Proceeding
In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing appellant Claude Lacombe contended that the lower court abused its discretion by sentencing his client to a term of natural life imprisonment violating his constitu... View Proceeding
In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing defendant Nathaniel Banks contended that the lower court abused its discretion by restricting Mr. Banks' constitutional right to present favorable evidence. Mr. Ba...
On January 28, 1997, defendant Craig Zebroski, was convicted by a jury in New Castle County, of two counts of First Degree Murder, and related charges, and sentenced to death. In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney... View Proceeding
In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing defendant James E. Cooke contended that the trial court abused its discretion when it failed to grant a mistrial when it was discovered, after the verdict, that a j... View Proceeding
AudioCaseFiles
Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience